![]() |
Re: BP 93 vs Quik Trip Premium: Real world, dyno proven results!
Probably, it seems to help turbo cars way more than it should. Both ethanol and methanol have very high latent heat of vaporisations compared to normal petrol fuels. Straight methanol doesn't have a crazy octane rating either, like 110-115 octane, while C16 is 116-117 octane. But you wouldn't see a C16 car running 60-80psi of boost with no intercooler, while you do with methanol cars.
|
Re: BP 93 vs Quik Trip Premium: Real world, dyno proven results!
I had my own experience switching from BP to Holiday gas today. I was running my Colt at about 20psi on BP gas with about 6-7 counts of knock. Got 92 at Holiday and turned the boost down to 18psi. Knock still doubled.
|
Re: BP 93 vs Quik Trip Premium: Real world, dyno proven results!
Quote:
|
Re: BP 93 vs Quik Trip Premium: Real world, dyno proven results!
I work at BP service writing and full service bitch, but yea, our gas is the shit. All sorts of people with nice cars come here because of the 93 octane hotness.
|
Re: BP 93 vs Quik Trip Premium: Real world, dyno proven results!
I don't seem to notice a difference from station to station, but I'll try and stick to the BP's as much as possible now. Good thing there's one right by my house.
|
Re: BP 93 vs Quik Trip Premium: Real world, dyno proven results!
I must be missing something... So he dynoed 270 originally, swapped TBs and came back another day, 270 again.
Came back a different time only switching to BP gas and now 318??? Guess I am a little leary as they were different days, temps, etc. Could have been a bad batch of gas or something else... I guess a better test would be slap the car on the dyno on BP, tune, drain all fuel, switch to holiday, and tune again. Still hard to rule out temp of the intake charge and the possibility of getting bad gas... |
Re: BP 93 vs Quik Trip Premium: Real world, dyno proven results!
I have had numerous similar experiences, I always use BP 93 in my GTP since I run a really small pulley on the super charger.
One day I was almost out of gas when I left work so I got a bit of gas at a Kwik Trip on my way home. I got on the hwy and gave it 3/4 throttle, it felt way down on power for some reason, I hooked my scan tool up to it and it was knocking bad around 10lbs of boost and 1/2 throttle. Good thing I only put $5 in it; subsequently I went and filled it up with BP93, got on the same hwy going back towards home and floored it with my scan tool on, 18lbs of boost and no knock. Doesn't get anymore real world than that. BP gas is very good, the only people that are going to be able to tell the difference is high compression cars, or boosted cars that are slightly to highly modified. I have filled up my Tahoe all over and can't tell the different from place to place, but my GTP that makes a measly 350whp chokes and pukes on SA, Holiday, and Kwik Trip gas. Don't know why though, you would think the gas would be farely close, I mean what the heck doesn't 92 octane mean 92 octane? Weird. |
Re: BP 93 vs Quik Trip Premium: Real world, dyno proven results!
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: BP 93 vs Quik Trip Premium: Real world, dyno proven results!
Quote:
Yes, the test could be better, but it wasn't a test, it's what happened while one guy's evo was down on power and Shane and others tried to help him figure out what the problem was. Just sharing real-world results, that's all. |
Re: BP 93 vs Quik Trip Premium: Real world, dyno proven results!
You should throw in another player: Shell V-Power!
|
Re: BP 93 vs Quik Trip Premium: Real world, dyno proven results!
Quote:
Now I'm not recommending this, it was just an experiment with my POS Colt. I have no tuning equipment but I'm assuming it runs a bit rich with the factory unhacked 1G MAS. |
Re: BP 93 vs Quik Trip Premium: Real world, dyno proven results!
Quote:
|
Re: BP 93 vs Quik Trip Premium: Real world, dyno proven results!
Quote:
|
Re: BP 93 vs Quik Trip Premium: Real world, dyno proven results!
I'm full on converting to E85 as soon as I get off my lazy ass and put a small 16G on the car. It still has the 11b, and with decent gasoline it has no problems at all maxing out the power potential of the miniturbo.
|
Re: BP 93 vs Quik Trip Premium: Real world, dyno proven results!
Nice, that's like a stock conquest. Just add a 1G mass and unplug the waste gate and done.
|
Re: BP 93 vs Quik Trip Premium: Real world, dyno proven results!
Quote:
|
Re: BP 93 vs Quik Trip Premium: Real world, dyno proven results!
I had an Evo 8 customer running Shell V-Power that was too prone to knock. He switched to BP 91 or 92(might have been back when the BPs only had 91) and we were able to pick up another 15awhp at the same boost level. Which is a decent amount on a 260awhp car.
|
Re: BP 93 vs Quik Trip Premium: Real world, dyno proven results!
Quote:
Put it in your car and let me know how it goes for ya. I've tried it and the car ran noticeably worse, and many others have experienced the same issue. |
Re: BP 93 vs Quik Trip Premium: Real world, dyno proven results!
hrm, this is rather interesting. I'll have to give BP 93 a try. I'll also have to talk with my BIL, he's in the 're-fueling gas station' business. IIRC, the majority of gas stations all get their fill from the same distributors. I believe there are only 2 or 3 here in MN.
|
Re: BP 93 vs Quik Trip Premium: Real world, dyno proven results!
I put some of this magic sauce in my car tonight, and it felt pretty good. I can't tell if it's because I wasn't wearing any shoes, or if it was raining, but it felt faster.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.