![]() |
Re: looking at Evo's. Few Questions.
Quote:
But as far as new cars go, there isn't a car on the market for under 100k that handles as well as an Evo. |
Re: looking at Evo's. Few Questions.
Quote:
|
Re: looking at Evo's. Few Questions.
Quote:
|
Re: looking at Evo's. Few Questions.
Quote:
Are you serious? |
Re: looking at Evo's. Few Questions.
Some of my favorite selections from my time reading sport's posts. Enjoy. rofl
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: looking at Evo's. Few Questions.
Holy shit the post above is amazing!!!
LMFAO. Of course an evo owner would say a GTR is not as good in the corners. Yeah there twice as much, but hands down stock for stock the GTR stomps an evo! OP just get an Jeep SRT8, dont want ya to get all homosexual on us. |
Re: looking at Evo's. Few Questions.
Quote:
|
Re: looking at Evo's. Few Questions.
Quote:
Can we chill with the constant sales pitching? If you're going to pass that on as fact, can you site some references? Here's a reference I was looking at, Evo's not even on the list. http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...n-100k-feature |
Re: looking at Evo's. Few Questions.
Quote:
|
Re: looking at Evo's. Few Questions.
I'm getting conflicting info on the fuel systems, are they capable of supporting the max the stock turbo can handle? With the X, how strong are the internals? They use a semi closed deck with sleeves unlike the caliber block isn't it? How strong are the sleeves? Internals stout or suspect?
|
Re: looking at Evo's. Few Questions.
Oh the retardation in this thread makes me LOL.
|
Re: looking at Evo's. Few Questions.
Quote:
|
Re: looking at Evo's. Few Questions.
Quote:
|
Re: looking at Evo's. Few Questions.
Quote:
The internals are fine, the weak point seems to be the rods just like the 4G63. 400-450whp (Mustang) is generally regarded as "safe" on the stock block with proper tuning. A bad tuner can blow up an engine at any power level though. A local here has hit a max of 466whp and his stock block is still holding together (~55k miles on it so far), he's actually going in for an E85 retune this week and I expect him to hit 480+. |
Re: looking at Evo's. Few Questions.
Quote:
What are you talking about? Because I find it funny that the #1 shit talker of Evo's now wants one? And the guy that pushes brand new Evo's on everyone and their grandmother thinks they are the greatest cars on the globe? Whatever dude... Anyways, Motors= weak if you go with more than a stock turbo/e85 setup. Drivetrain = built like a tank, if you have an 08, get the diff pin installed. Fuel system= Get a Walbro and be done. If you go with a big stock frame turbo like a Black/EF4/BBX/etc, you may need more. |
Re: looking at Evo's. Few Questions.
The stock motor isn't really "weak".
It's perspective I guess, you just need to manage torque. 400-500whp isn't an issue if your turbo is laggy enough. And proper tuning is very very important. Oh, and lol at this :) |
Re: looking at Evo's. Few Questions.
LOLOL wow. Mind blown @ trogdor, the newbness is so great! And the evo bashing now turned nutswing is epic!
|
Re: looking at Evo's. Few Questions.
Why wasn't the miata on that top handling car for under 100k? What a joke. I do know nothing of the bigger NC and thats probably what they are comparing...
-Colin |
Re: looking at Evo's. Few Questions.
If you are staying stock turbo and run out of fuel, it's easy to address anyway. It takes 30 minutes to swap and hardwire a better fuel pump and injectors are right in the front of the engine bay if you're going e85.
|
Re: looking at Evo's. Few Questions.
Wow, what a great thread! Lots of good stuff in here, thanks for the smiles on a hump day morning :D An Evo being better handling than an Elise or Cayman/Boxster... Can't make that up!
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.