![]() |
Hawver Intake Manifold
I've been looking at these on DSM Tuners, DSM Talk, etc. I was wondering if anybody around here was running one or knows someone who is, and if so what kind of numbers they have seen. Just looking for some local feedback here on this nice looking piece that is all.
http://hawvermotorsports.com/products.html http://hawvermotorsports.com/images/...%20Maifold.jpg http://hawvermotorsports.com/images/...e/DSCF0715.JPG |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
That is one ugly manifold lol. That'd pretty much the only opinion I have.
|
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
I like cast pieces, because they are usually robust.
Having said that, that is indeed one ugly intake manifold. If the fins and name were machined off and the body polished it might look decent. |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
I have been wondering about these as well... They aren't bling or eye catching by any means. However, they appear to be a better replacement cast intake mani than the stock version IMHO.
Nothing wrong with a cast manifold, very strong. Shit, shave the Hawver shit shaved off and polish it and it will look like a Magnus. |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
Someone had on at the cookout. It looked alot better in person then online. But you shouldnt be buying an intake by looks anyway. These look like a very nice intake IMO The plenum could be Bigger But id should be comparible to a Magnus or JMfab.
|
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
lol.
I wanted to go cast when i was looking at IM, but with the warranty's of all the SMIM ones i figured go with them. I used to have some comparisons of where this was a really decent mani for being cast, but i think it was always topped by the others probably a lot more so since the others have redesigned theirs. |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
I like the looks of the manifold. Reminds me of a FP cast exhaust mani.
|
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
It kind of reminds me of an offenhauser manifold.
Old school style http://www.offyparts.com/images/offy_6019.JPG http://www.steenaero.com/Files/Artic...smobile_11.JPG http://www.53classicchevy.com/images...e-manifold.jpg |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
I think they're sweet! Definitely the one I would get far over anything else. They're supposed to have decent gains without killing the low end, but I'd definitely like to see more than the 1 or 2 dyno sheets available.
|
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
I don't think it looks bad. The lettering and lines has an old school muscle car look to it.
http://i6.ebayimg.com/06/i/000/fe/59/fee0_1_sbl.JPG |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
cast mani's rock. I have one on the evo III
|
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
I like em, and sometimes wish I would have gone with one of those over my JMF.
|
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
Quote:
|
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
I definately like the warranty on these things:
"Warranty? Hawver manifolds carry a lifetime warranty against defects in materials and workmanship. This includes structural failure for any reason that might apply to it's intended use as an intake manifold. This also covers breach due to N2O or methanol backfires. Defective parts will be repaired or replaced at our discretion. To file a claim or for further information please contact us at info@hawvermotorsports.com" I don't think the Magnus, JMF, or others cover this do they? Plus it seems the people that run these seem to gain bottom end rather than lose it, while still seeing nice gains up top. It may be ugly, but nothing a little bit of powdercoating couldn't take care of. |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
Quote:
|
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
Quote:
and your exhaust manifold was a tube header of some sort. |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
The intake is a hks copy. It is a 2 piece cast inktake. They did it that way so it could have the v stacks on the runners.
The exhaust manifold is s.s. cast weld l's. It was the first on that was on johns (pushit2.0) drag galant vr4 |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
I did a little research and discovered that the dynograph they have on their website http://www.hawvermotorsports.com/dyno_results.html came from a member on DSMtalk.com (reference thread: http://www.dsmtalk.com/forums/showth...=199371&page=4 ) . at the time of the dyno he was running: "16g, pump gas, w/ meth and a modded sidemount"
Might not be a bad option for those of us who prefer smaller turbo setups. |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
Stronger but also heavier than a SMIM.
|
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
I think I would be willing to sacrifice 5-10lbs just for the durability.
|
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
I think it looks pretty good, almost 'stockish' looking. :)
|
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
Hmm, if my Magnus ever cracks I'll have to look into one of these.
|
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
Quote:
The best way to go faster is to lighten the load. |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
Quote:
every pound counts when you want to go fast If it didn't super cars wouldn't have exotic light wieght metals used in thier construction. Racecars wouldn't have carbon fiber and aluminum seats or plastic windows. Removing wieght is the #1 way to make your car faster, handle better, and stop quicker. |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
Quote:
Not to mention I'm sure your JMF intake is a lot more expensive than this cast mani... |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
Nope, this one is $550, the JMF is $590. JMF is 7.5 lbs, this one probably isn't much over 10.
Anyway, I like the cast look, more sleeper than a shiny SMIM, would look good in flat black. |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
Quote:
Quote:
If having a light car is so important to you, why start with such a heavy ass car, get a Honduh instead. |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
How about you guys stop "fighting" over an intake manifold.
|
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
if you shed 5 pounds in a car that runs a flat 13 second 1/4 that weighs 3000 pounds
you should be able to run 12.999792 an improvment of .000208 just throwing that out there, all theoretical of course |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
Quite an impressive gain; that is, if they timed it to at least the 4th decimal place.
|
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
That's the difference between running a 13 and a 12 though :D
|
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
Quote:
|
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
Truf
|
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
Quote:
I never said JMF was better. Just added that the cast manifold would be heavier. Then you got butthurt, then I got butthurt :lol: I'm a freak when it comes to lowering the wieght of my cars. A little here and there adds up fast. |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
power to weight ratio, really, 5 pounds, you talking a difference of .01 change in ratio. .02 if your only running 300 hp. also assuming 3000 pound car.
i think the added reliability for 5 pounds would be worth it, even more for those running n2o plus the chances of it getting damaged would be for less for a cast unit |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
Quote:
Like I also said earlier, wieght ads up. 5lbs here 10 lbs there. Less work for your engine to accellerate, also less stress on your drivetrain. Less work for your brakes to stop you too. I am in no way trying to steer anybody away from running a cast mani. With a direct port setup you'd be less likely to kill an intake plenum with a N2O backfire anyways :D |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
Dsm's never have nitrous back fires.
The thing is kinda ugly and it'd be cool to see a comparison between this and a jmf |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
Quote:
Sorry Brad, I couldn't resist |
Re: Hawver Intake Manifold
i think shaved and polished it could be a very nice piece
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.