![]() |
this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTeH...e_gdata_player
for big turbos this sounds like it would be nice, im not familiar with intakes at all. are there better options , that still give good low end ? but you know what they say "just one more moving part to break" (has anyone ran this setup?) just looking for options on the rebuild. |
Re: this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?
thats pretty sweet, dsms forever evolving!!
|
Re: this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?
I was going to run one of those years ago on my 2G but opted out. End of the day once you are making decent power, this is a restriction and it'd have to go bye-bye anyways :)
|
Re: this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?
I've always been curious about these. They seem to be a little too expensive as everyone wants gold for them. I can understand why though. It would probably be decent on a 16g or equivalent car.
|
Re: this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?
They work well.
Here's a dyno of a 16g gas setup from 2007: http://i.imgur.com/4ZOedzc.jpg Blue line is the Cyclone, red is a 1G Stock manifold. The record for max power on a Cyclone was 621 HP on a DJ using a laggy GT-35: http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f3...0car/621HP.jpg I suspect like scheides said, it would be a restriction on high-flow setups, but I have absolute data from back-to-back runs with the same setup. |
Re: this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?
Quote:
so for a 2.3 hx40 build , wanting 500ish do you think it would be a benefit or a restriction? ive read that it out flows a 1g , but not by much. seeing how my engine is already a 2.3 I figured the cyclone would give even more grunt in the low end before boost steps in. |
Re: this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?
Im running a cyclone intake on my 2.3 with an actuator just like in the video. Automatic with stock cams and a bastard 20g at 32-35 psi. It is a nut case out of the hole.
Im also going to further the actuator setup by adding a boost control solenoid and controlling it with my evo 8 ecu so that it only opens the butterflys at 4000 rpm. |
Re: this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?
Quote:
|
Re: this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?
Quote:
I agree, it would not be a good choice for comparing it to a smim for 1/4 mile drag racing and overall power. But for a fun street car, and maybe the 1/8th mile, I like it! |
Re: this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?
http://www.mitsustyle.com/photopost/.../IMG_00252.JPG
FYI: It was a pain to clear the A/C compressor, and it was a pain relocating the coil pack and setting up the wastegate actuator. You can kind of see the wastegate actuator under the spark plug wires. |
Re: this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?
Damn, Chad... that looks awesome!
Are you going to be at the spring dyno with it? I think a friendly peak TQ contest would be in order :) |
Re: this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?
Can I join friendly peak torque battle? :) Or is it for 1g's only?
|
Re: this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?
Quote:
|
Re: this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?
Quote:
|
Re: this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?
TD05H vs. EF4 !
|
Re: this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?
Quote:
|
Re: this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?
Quote:
|
Re: this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?
Quote:
|
Re: this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?
Quote:
|
Re: this looks to good to be true, has it been proven?
Quote:
1g throttle body bolt right up ? dis the intake make a well worth it difference? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.