Quote:
Originally posted by . guest .+Jan 26 2004, 10:56 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (. guest . @ Jan 26 2004, 10:56 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by Jakey@Jan 26 2004, 10:55 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by MustGoFaster@Jan 26 2004, 10:08 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-. guest .
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
@Jan 26 2004, 07:40 PM
Advice: Stick with the 4g63.
|
I was just wondering if there is any specific logic to this? I don't care for the 2.4 '64 thing much my self but I almost feel like I am missing out on something. I know most of the benefits and down sides but more insight is always welcome.
|
Well, I'm going to toss out my $0.02 as how I interpreted .guest.'s comment. I believe he is saying that if DJGHOST has not done enough research on the 4G64 to know whether it is possible to do the 4G64/63 swap, he should probably be straying away from it.
|
Hey, at least someone understands my bitchy asshole responses.
[/b][/quote]
I should have taken it at face value, oh well.
and to npaulseth: ANY MOTOR CAN CRANK WALK!! 2.4, 2.0, 350sbc, it doesn't matter! 7-bolts are prone to it, so a 7-bolt 2.4 is going to be just as prone to it as a 7-bolt 2.0.