Quote:
Originally posted by Jakey+Feb 21 2004, 10:08 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Jakey @ Feb 21 2004, 10:08 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-npaulseth@Feb 21 2004, 09:59 AM
Good lord man.* Don't you see what your typing.* YOU ARE MAKING HUGE ASUMPTIONS.* You can't just asume that Saddam has this, or does that.* You need proof!* And look at how many internalion troops are fighting with us, and then try and tell me that it is an internal war.* You are truely misinformed.
|
Where are these assumptions, please specifically expand on what you're trying to say. [/b][/quote]
1. there were WMDs in Iraq at some point, they must of went somewhere, either unfound still in Iraq or even worse they made it to the hands of terrorists.
2. The WMDs are not a figment of Bush's(or his advisors) imagination and did exist in Iraq at some point.
3. And just because there is no evidence of Saddam supporting Al Queida, doesn't mean he didn't support Al Queida or other terrorist groups.
4. even if Saddam didn't directly support Al Queida up to the present, it was only a matter of time before he did support Al Queida or other terroristic efforts against us.
5. There is no doubt in my mind, history will show Iraq did support terrorism and its WMDs ended up in the wrong hands.
6. Like I said before, any tyrannical regime with a large military and large amount of wepons is a threat, especially when they are ignoring UN resolutions. (Iraq had a very small military actually. They had like two or three working Planes I think. You can thank the smart Bush for that one.)
7. I also fail to see how either of those can compare to the million+ people that were murdered under Saddam.
8. (Best one yet) By the way Iraq does have/had WMD we just havent found them yet becuase they are burried in there desserts or they are hiding in neighboring countries.
9. (Another good one) Its well documented that Iraq DID have WMDs, if they are not in Iraq now, that means they made it to the black market, which is a HUGE threat to the US and in itself warranted removing Saddam from power.
10. Waiting for UN backing would have had little difference, considering there are troops from US, UK, Australia, Canada, Japan, etc
11. Just because there is, as of yet, no evidence of Saddam supporting Al Queida, doesn't mean he didn't.
12. Iraq chose to fuck with the UN resolutions (The UN is "BS" so why are you arguing that they are important?)
13. Military actions against regimes that support terrorism(or even ones that don't at present, but have the capability (Every country in the whole world has capability to support a terrorist org.)
Don't ya think if we found something, it would have been reported so that Bush wouldn't look like such an ass right now?