View Single Post
Old 03-20-2008   #25
Halon
Pewp Champion
 
Halon's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Blaine
Drives: Teh Bean
Posts: 12,309
Send a message via AIM to Halon
Re: Krank Vent replacments

There's one thing I just noticed Chris that contradicts what I've heard in the past. I've always understood that you don't want to place a check valve inline between the VC and the intake pipe. Leaving that line open should better help ventilate the dirty blow-by air out, by not only allowing the old air to go out the PCV line, but by also allowing fresh air from the intake in. By putting one in line with the Intake & VC, I understand that at idle you'll create a much stronger vacuum under idling or low throttle conditions, but I don't understand the benefit of that. It wouldn't ventilate the dirty blowby air out of there as well as if you had the open line allowing in fresh air. That dirty air is bad for the oil, and you want to get that out of there as quickly as possible. If it's creating excessive vacuum at idle, enough that it's actually difficult to remove your dipstick, that seems like it may actually be bad. My CCV system is one of the little things I was going to improve upon this summer, so I actually read up a bit on this subject not too long ago. But my plan only involved using a check valve (as a back up to the PCV) between the VC and the IM. Here's a nice little MS Paint version of what I planned on doing to give a visual idea, using 2 catch cans.

Edit - picture added.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	CCV diagram.JPG
Views:	4323
Size:	18.5 KB
ID:	7125  
__________________
B-Man - FlexFuel Mafia
1991 TSi AWD E85 - BEP S362, DSMLink V2, Built 2.0L Idle Vid 628hp Graph 541hp Vid 10.93@137 Vid
1992 SC300 E85 - BW 84-75, Vlad Infinity, NA-T, 6spd Idle Vid 709hp Graph 709hp Vid 11.1@131 Vid
2006 Bayliner 195 - Carbed 5.0 Top Speed Test

Last edited by Halon; 03-20-2008 at 06:47 PM..
Halon is offline   Reply With Quote