Quote:
Originally posted by JET+Apr 26 2004, 10:07 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (JET @ Apr 26 2004, 10:07 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Jakey@Apr 25 2004, 09:42 PM
This is in result to a direct conflict of interest between myself and an adminstrator in regards to the policy of the 'private message' feature ceasing to maintain the 'private' feature for those members of the adminstrator team who choose to read PMs.
Thanks,
Jake
|
Wow, that is pretty interesting!!! :fworld: [/b][/quote]
No, not really. It's in the rules, loud and clear. And it helps us keep those people who care to contribute nothing, but waste bandwith chatting with their buds via PMs, off the site. There are several cases in which we reserve the right to read PMs. And again it's publicly posted and if it's all that private pick up the phone.
Anything else on this that is lead to be a debate will be deleted.