MitsuStyle - View Single Post

Super Bleeder!! · 03-15-2006

i like the 2.4Ls extra deck height. more deck height = increased rod ratio = less cylinder side loading = less wear.

not like it really matters, i don't think the avg lifespan of a 2.3/2.4 is 100k miles in built form.

03-15-2006	#3
Super Bleeder!! Reynolds number user Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: grove/tempe Posts: 3,553	Re: 2.3L vs 2.4L i like the 2.4Ls extra deck height. more deck height = increased rod ratio = less cylinder side loading = less wear. not like it really matters, i don't think the avg lifespan of a 2.3/2.4 is 100k miles in built form. __________________ 07 Ducati Monster S4R 00 honda elite 50 (64 mph braH!) 05 malaguti F15 04 E55 AMG