11-04-2008
|
#1
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Blaine, MN
Drives: '91 Automagic
Posts: 13,908
|
T3 vs. Mitsu housing
Can anyone explain the differences/ pros vs. cons of these?
i am looking at turbo's about 50 trim sized and I have the opportunity to go T3 instead of bolt on, just wondering if i should.
To me if i have the same turbo, by going T3 I would lose spool but gain topend.
|
|
|
11-04-2008
|
#2
|
flips McGee
|
Re: T3 vs. Mitsu housing
Two primary differences. One, you'll have to go to an aftermarket manifold. This will usually be a tubular-style setup, cost a lot, possibly crack over time, and more specifically yield more top-end power and sacrifice a bit of bottom-end.
The T3 hotsides you'd go with either a .63 or .86. Smaller = better spool, less top end, and vice versa. On a 50-trim on a 2.0, the smaller hotside will likely be ideal.
The bolt-on hotides are usually small-ish to somewhere in between, comparable to a .74 or so.
|
|
|
11-04-2008
|
#3
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Blaine, MN
Drives: '91 Automagic
Posts: 13,908
|
Re: T3 vs. Mitsu housing
To be exact, I am looking at an HX35 in either a bolt-on .55 a/r or T3 .70 a/r.
Spool in bolt-on is said to be comparable to E316G but top end has been reported 50lb/min+, a friend of mine is seeing 49 lb/min @26psi.
|
|
|
11-04-2008
|
#4
|
At-Least-It's-White-Again
|
Re: T3 vs. Mitsu housing
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbotalon1g
To be exact, I am looking at an HX35 in either a bolt-on .55 a/r or T3 .70 a/r.
Spool in bolt-on is said to be comparable to E316G but top end has been reported 50lb/min+, a friend of mine is seeing 49 lb/min @26psi.
|
Looks like a HX35 compressor wheel or whatever flows 55-60 lbs a minute is what the general info after googling says. Thats more than that evo16g will flow but I highly doubt it will spool as fast. You know there will always be a trade off for spool vs. more flow... right?
If you hated the sc61 or whatever you had, you'll probably hate the HX35 too.
__________________
'04 Honda Ricer: stock
Done fuckin' with cars but I will snap some photos of yours for now! =)
|
|
|
11-04-2008
|
#5
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Blaine, MN
Drives: '91 Automagic
Posts: 13,908
|
Re: T3 vs. Mitsu housing
Yes I understand that, I guess what I am trying to do here is gain more top end, but not so much lag that comes with it.
I can say that there are times when I miss the 61.
That is why I am going for this, its along the lines of a 50 trim, which I think I will be happy with on the scm61 I had 20psi by 4200rpm.
I guess I would like this a bit earlier maybe late 3000s (3500-3900).
The bolton housing on a HX35 has dyno'd 500whp on a few cars. (yes we all know dynos are diff, but I have a baseline of this setup and want to improve a bit)
|
|
|
11-04-2008
|
#6
|
formerly ecoli
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On the dyno
Posts: 4,892
|
Re: T3 vs. Mitsu housing
A/R is just a ratio like trim, they don't mean a whole lot unless you are comparing to other housing in the same family. A .64 A/R T25 housing is tiny compared to a T3 .63 A/R. A T3 .82 A/R probably falls into line some where between a .58 and .68 T4 exhaust housing for spoolup/power. The PTE Mitsu .63 A/Rs are a tad bit smaller than the PTE T3 .63A/R. A Garrett GT42R 1.01 A/R divided T4 housing sounds huge, but it's really comparable to a T4 .68 undivided.
Spoolup can often more come down to cams, exhaust manifold design(huge), intake manifold, boost leaks, ignition timing, etc. The worst looking pile of shit true log manifold will usually spool a turbo the quickest, but have a big performance hit in the upper RPMs. Long runner fancy top mount manifolds no matter how perfectly they are design are usually laggy, which is fine if you need to make power from 8000-10000 RPMs.
I did one car with 3 different kinds of exhaust manifolds on the same turbo and saw 1000+ RPM spoolup difference from the worst to the best. eBay manifold spooled ok, but power was blah. Tried a fancy top mount, gained about 40hp, but 500 more rpms of lag. Tried a short runner tubular and made the same power as the top mount but spooled 1000 rpms quicker than the top mount and 500 quicker than the eBay.
I haven't had any BW or Holset turbos on the dyno that really blew me away as spooling way faster or making huge amounts more power. Some of those turbos are quite good, but not anything magic. The huge BWs(S372 and bigger) do spool pretty good for their size, but we aren't talking worlds different than others. It's hard to compare different cars, dynos, setups, etc over the internet to each other. The FP setups are usually noticably quicker spooling than comparable Garrett setups, but a lot of people use the FP exhaust manifold with them too.
|
|
|
11-04-2008
|
#7
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Blaine, MN
Drives: '91 Automagic
Posts: 13,908
|
Re: T3 vs. Mitsu housing
^Thanks man. You've been a lot of help with a lot of questions.
Well I am thinking about keeping the FP Mani I have and just getting the bolt-on housing. I think anything I can do to keep spool would be good plus I only log a max on 38 lb/min now so even if I do get to 49 lb/min I will love it.
|
|
|
11-04-2008
|
#8
|
Pewp Champion
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Blaine
Drives: Teh Bean
Posts: 12,309
|
Re: T3 vs. Mitsu housing
What about something like a 20G in a 7cm housing? Might be able to find a used one around for a decent price. Should still spool decently, give you a little more top end, bolt up to your mani, just have to figure out a WG setup for it.
|
|
|
11-04-2008
|
#9
|
Kevin
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Shoreview
Posts: 3,356
|
Re: T3 vs. Mitsu housing
I'm gonna sound dumb, the when referenceing the 6cm^2/7cm^2 they are talking about the area of the turbo exhaust housing inlet, correct? Like for example, the stock 14bs are 6cm^2 and cool people use that mitsu gasket and port them to 7cm^2. Or am I retarded.
__________________
Misses the Mitsu Community
Currently on Corvette #4
|
|
|
11-04-2008
|
#10
|
immune from paybans
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: West Des Moines
Drives: poorly
Posts: 4,358
|
Re: T3 vs. Mitsu housing
You're thinking of the diameter of the turbine housing inlet, 6cm across, not 6cm^2 area.
|
|
|
11-04-2008
|
#11
|
Kevin
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Shoreview
Posts: 3,356
|
Re: T3 vs. Mitsu housing
oops.
__________________
Misses the Mitsu Community
Currently on Corvette #4
|
|
|
11-05-2008
|
#12
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Willmar, MN
Drives: 91GSX; 98 GSX; 92 Tsi AWD; Kawasaki ZR7
Posts: 319
|
Re: T3 vs. Mitsu housing
I've been looking into upgrading to a Holset. This is about all I've been reading about online lately. From what I've found, full boost (hx35) is around 3500 rpms and capable of 500awhp all with the DSM bolt-on housing. 52 lbs/min for the hx35, and 2-3 less for the h1c. 60 something for the hx40 (I don't want anything that big so haven't cared about the exact number) -- 650hp so probably 65+ lbs/min and with full boost by low to mid 4 grand. Pretty awesome spool vs hp I would say. I'm probably throwing an h1c on my car.
Last edited by jrohner; 11-05-2008 at 12:15 AM..
|
|
|
11-05-2008
|
#13
|
At-Least-It's-White-Again
|
Re: T3 vs. Mitsu housing
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrohner
From what I've found, full boost (hx35) is around 3500 rpms and capable of 500awhp all with the DSM bolt-on housing.
|
How much "full boost" at 3500? Maybe 20 psi on a 2.4L and a HX35, but I highly doubt 30 psi by 3500 on a typical 2.0L or any boost level that would make 500awhp. I'd like to see these dyno charts. I think the honda-tech disease is spreading to the dsm world. (I made 600whp on my gt35r and 10 psi and full boost by 2000rpms!)
__________________
'04 Honda Ricer: stock
Done fuckin' with cars but I will snap some photos of yours for now! =)
Last edited by At-Least-It's-An-Evo; 11-05-2008 at 07:41 AM..
|
|
|
11-05-2008
|
#14
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Willmar, MN
Drives: 91GSX; 98 GSX; 92 Tsi AWD; Kawasaki ZR7
Posts: 319
|
Re: T3 vs. Mitsu housing
Quote:
Originally Posted by At-Least-It's-An-Evo
How much "full boost" at 3500? Maybe 20 psi on a 2.4L and a HX35, but I highly doubt 30 psi by 3500 on a typical 2.0L or any boost level that would make 500awhp. I'd like to see these dyno charts. I think the honda-tech disease is spreading to the dsm world. (I made 600whp on my gt35r and 10 psi and full boost by 2000rpms!)
|
Then go look for them if you actually care. Look up something before you go slamming it.
If you run a bigger t3 housing it will take over 4 grand to spool on a 2.0. People have said the hx35 starts making boost sooner than a 16g so it's not quite as hard of a hit. It would be lame if it took a 2.4 to build boost by 3500, that would probably be worse than a 50 trim not better.
Last edited by jrohner; 11-05-2008 at 10:09 AM..
|
|
|
11-05-2008
|
#15
|
At-Least-It's-White-Again
|
Re: T3 vs. Mitsu housing
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrohner
Then go look for them if you actually care. Look up something before you go slamming it.
|
Nope, I don't care. Nor do I care for a HX35 or the bullseye housing for it. It's too small of a turbo anyways.
Saying it gets "full boost" and putting that it makes 500whp in the same sentence makes it sound like if you are gonna run the 30 psi it'll take to make that power, that it'd make it by 3500 is all I'm saying, and we know that's probably not the case like how Honda-tech'ers always forget to say that their boost crept up to 15 psi to make that 500whp.
If you have the opportunity/finances Aaron, get a T3 housing unless you're gonna get some FP housing. Just my opinion.
__________________
'04 Honda Ricer: stock
Done fuckin' with cars but I will snap some photos of yours for now! =)
Last edited by At-Least-It's-An-Evo; 11-05-2008 at 10:22 AM..
|
|
|
11-05-2008
|
#16
|
Reynolds number user
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: grove/tempe
Posts: 3,553
|
Re: T3 vs. Mitsu housing
Whats the highest trap achieved with an hx35 on a dsm?
__________________
07 Ducati Monster S4R
00 honda elite 50 (64 mph braH!)
05 malaguti F15
04 E55 AMG
|
|
|
11-05-2008
|
#17
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Willmar, MN
Drives: 91GSX; 98 GSX; 92 Tsi AWD; Kawasaki ZR7
Posts: 319
|
Re: T3 vs. Mitsu housing
Quote:
Originally Posted by Super Bleeder!!
Whats the highest trap achieved with an hx35 on a dsm?
|
Not sure yet, there is a results thread that people are starting to post, I haven't read through the whole 15916616465456565 pages of holset info. I've seen around 125-130mph so far. I do highly doubt all those pages are false information.
I wouldn't be thinking about switching to one if I could hold a few more psi with my 16g.
Last edited by jrohner; 11-05-2008 at 11:11 AM..
|
|
|
11-05-2008
|
#18
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boulder, CO
Drives: Conquest
Posts: 5,049
|
Re: T3 vs. Mitsu housing
I left a standalone log in the toilet this morning.
|
|
|
11-05-2008
|
#19
|
Hates blue couplers.
|
Re: T3 vs. Mitsu housing
Quote:
Originally Posted by FattyBoomBatty
I left a standalone log in the toilet this morning.
|
Yes!!!
Oh and uh..Mitsu housing.
|
|
|
12-22-2008
|
#20
|
Holset's Sex Bitch
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Virginia
Drives: 1990 Eclipse, 1991 Eclipse with a little Holset Sex
Posts: 74
|
Re: T3 vs. Mitsu housing
Wow! I expected this in June; not in November after this seasons results have been posted.
Ok. No heresay. My car, my turbo. H1C bolt-on housing 54mm compressor inducer and 84mm compressor exducer (50-trim/20g flow potential at better high boost efficiency), turbine wheel about the size of an t350 (t3 stage 5) turbine wheel. Fp2 cams with stock manifolds on a 2.0L motor: 28psi by 3600rpms. 20+ psi by 3400rpms. ON THE ROAD. My small 16g spooled the same with the same setup. The h1c has the hx35 turbine wheel with a slightly smaller compressor. The hx35 has a 56mm inducer.
Maglin, on dsmtuners, full boost (30psi) by 3600rpms with the hx35.
Same turbo has done 11.2@126mph with the same bolt-on housing at 28psi stock weight. These results at 28psi with no manifold upgrades and just 272s is not indicative of a turbine that is sacrificing flow for spool.
494whp @ 25psi. Typical boltons, including the bolton housing. No exhaust manifold upgrade. Considering the above trap speed this would be expected with 3psi less boost.
There's plenty more. If you really care, you'll look. If you don't, you won't call BS without proof yourself. But I do agree that the bep turbine housing is too small for poor flowing poor spooling garret T turbine wheels. And I do agree that the bolton housing is a choke to the later 60lb/min hx35 compressor wheel, of which has the same spool speed. The t3 bep turbine housing or the stock hx35 t3 turbine housing with the stock hx35 turbine wheel is proven to flow enough for 600whp (based on trap speeds not inconsistant dyno numbers) and spools to 20+ psi ON THE ROAD by 3900-4000rpms. When can a td06 20g spool to 20+ psi ?
__________________
Matt
Bolton Holset H1C w/ external gate, fp2X cams, DSMLink, 3" exhaust, FMIC, water injection
"There is nothing better for man than to eat, drink, and see good for all his hard work." Solomon
Last edited by wheelhop; 12-22-2008 at 04:01 PM..
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|