New EvoX Prototype to be unveiled at 1pm CST today! - Page 3

MustGoFaster · 01-09-2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSM_420

I wonder if it would look good with the plastic under the mitsu badge including the badge itself removed with a giant FMIC?

That part covers one of those safty thingys called a crash bar. Not that DSM'ers don't ditch it all the time anyways.

DSM_421 · 01-09-2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by MustGoFaster

That part covers one of those safty thingys called a crash bar. Not that DSM'ers don't ditch it all the time anyways.

Just a safty thingy? Well shit rip that fucker right out then.

DSM_421 · 01-09-2007

First Render of what I want it to look like, FMIC pic coming next.

**Keep in mind I have no skill in photoshop so I'm using my paint skillz to do this.

Edit - Second Exclusive render done. A 420 Designs FMIC capable of 650+ HP goals.

DSM_421 · 01-09-2007

I said the sound system is available, I wouldn't get it personally. I just put it in the pros for people who would be interested, after all its a nice option and I'm sure plenty will want it.

I also agree with you to take the rear spoiler off, I don't like rear spoilers AT ALL! But, then again many do and like to keep them, thats why I put that under cons.

About the upholstery... well I saw that as funny, copied and paisted from article thats not really a pro or con.

Finally but not least playa, the navigation system is for ballers, thats also why it is under the pro section. Clearly you don't fall into the baller category thanks for clarifying that for me.

DSM_421 · 01-09-2007

Cruise is a must but a sunroof is just another weight addition.

curt_gendron · 01-09-2007

The EVO X is by far the best looking Mitsu since the 3000GT. I really like the direction they took with the new EVO. I'm definately getting one when it comes out. Its probably 6 to 9 months away from showing up at dealerships.

later,
Curt

CDeutsch · 01-09-2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by curt_gendron

I really like the direction they took with the new EVO.

That right there tells me Mitsu F'd this one up.

If I look at it as a new car all by itself it's pretty cool, but I'm pretty worried they missed the mark as far as what's made the Evo a success in the past. The Evo VII-IX is 250-300lbs heavier then the Evo VI. The X is another 200lbs on top of that. My bet right now is that this car won't be as popular/successful in motorsports which IMO was the Evo's bread and butter, but I guess we'll have to wait for real numbers before getting to excited. Plus there's always hope the RS will be 200lbs lighter.

curt_gendron · 01-09-2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDeutsch

That right there tells me Mitsu F'd this one up.

Hey, don't get mad at me.... I did make you buy a car that looks like a Ford Focus.

later,
Curt

**JET** · 01-09-2007

I could see the RS being a huge difference with the Evo X, if they drop all the automated stuff. Go back to the IX drivetrain and it should be a lot lighter. That could really get me interested. We'll have to see how it plays out.

**Shane@DBPerformance** · 01-09-2007

Why do I keep thinking Cobalt SS?

It would be nice if Mitsu dumped the old 4G63 into a more affordable platform. Just some piece of shit with an AWD 4G63 (aka Eclipse). It doesn't need Super-Duper AWD System 5.0, race suspension and come ready to take to a rally. Hopefully they also figure out how to keep the new Evos from rusting instantly too.

**Halon** · 01-09-2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by ecoli

Why do I keep thinking Cobalt SS?

It would be nice if Mitsu dumped the old 4G63 into a more affordable platform. Just some piece of shit with an AWD 4G63 (aka Eclipse). It doesn't need Super-Duper AWD System 5.0, race suspension and come ready to take to a rally. Hopefully they also figure out how to keep the new Evos from rusting instantly too.

I completely agree with that. That's why I'm looking forward to them coming out with that RalliArt version that's supposed to be more comparable to a standard WRX. Screw the supercar handling, the HID's, the leather, electronically controlled drivetrain. Just an AWD car, with somewhat decent looks, with a decent motor. Hell give it pop-ups too!!

**Kracka** · 01-09-2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halon

I completely agree with that. That's why I'm looking forward to them coming out with that RalliArt version that's supposed to be more comparable to a standard WRX. Screw the supercar handling, the HID's, the leather, electronically controlled drivetrain. Just an AWD car, with somewhat decent looks, with a decent motor. Hell give it pop-ups too!!

Sounds boring....like a WRX. It would sell quite well I'm sure since it would appeal to the masses and Mitsu definitely needs some sort of stepping-stone between the regular Lancer and the EVO. Appealing to the masses is not what the EVO is designed to do.

A//// Guy · 01-09-2007

http://www.lancerproject.com/

A little more info and more pictures. Alot of the pics are of the regular lancer though.

**Halon** · 01-09-2007

Well I don't consider a GSX boring. And that's all I'm looking for. Something comparable to the DSM's. A good platform, doesn't need brembo brakes, a carbon fiber spoiler, and some super suspension. Just something that has a decent platform, and is affordable, and has decent looks. I don't road race, I suck at it, and I am not comfortable taking sharp turns at high speeds. I like accerating real fast! So keep the electronically controlled drivetrain, keep the HID's, the recaro seats, and the big spoiler. Give me something like what the DSM's were, cheap, fun, and easy to build upon.

But I'm not saying I don't love evo's. I think they are great, I just can't afford one at the moment. If they came out with that RalliArt, well in 4 years, I may be able to afford one.

A//// Guy · 01-09-2007

Brandon, buy an SRT4 :P

**Halon** · 01-09-2007

You must have missed where I said AWD

Kevin 1G Drummer · 01-09-2007

I agree. They definatly need a stepping stone between the regular Lancer and the Evo. I can't figure out why Mitsu doesn't do that. Subaru had pretty wood success with the WRX, so I would think Mitsu would do well with a similar car.

CVD · 01-09-2007

They had a concept called the Tarmac. Not sure what happened to it, guess they just figured people wouldnt pay Evo prices for something smaller than an Evo...or maybe they just didnt want to make a car that was slightly cheaper than the Evo that outperformed it because it was lighter.

92EvilTalon · 01-09-2007

I wont be buying one. But I sure am going to drool over it. I can see were B is going at on this. The reason why the Evo VIII and IX's were spendy is because all that extra stuff. Custom Recaro seats Brembo brakes...Carbon fiber wing. They should of just went back to the 3/S wing that looks the same, and used it. They had a deal with Enkei I think with the Ralliart Lancer rims. So keep the rims. But the brakes, seats, and carbon wing screw all that. And that three setting center dif...did it change anything? Bah...I rather see Mitsu dig out of a hole then go deeper. Thats my 2 cents.

98gstaherns · 01-09-2007

i would like to have one of those HKS eclipses. AWD 4g63 thats all i want lol