Marco "claims" that in theory, based on the geometry, the rod ratio difference is worth about maybe 200-400 rpm more, but in practice it's worth alot more.
My main reason for going with the long rod version is not because it was the most expensive (althought some might think differently
), but because I wanted the "best of both worlds" so to speak. I wanted the longer stroke of the 2.4L for my heavy car, but I also wanted the ability to turn higher rpms with less chance of scuffing the pistons/cylinder walls that can happen on a high rev'ed 2.4L
__________________
"You don't have a clue. You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance."
When she get's bitchy, SPANK THAT ASS!
(#Y#)
Threaded Mode