02-21-2004
|
#2
|
Admin
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sportsman's Paradise, LA.
Posts: 5,382
|
I can't speak for the 414's (never ran them) but the HKS 264/264 & 272/272 cams work fine with stock head, gears and springs. The same rpm limit applies as it would with the stock cams (because of the stock springs). Boost is not an issue, I ran up to 24-25psi on both set of the HKS cams with no problem (22psi on my 16g).
__________________
"You don't have a clue. You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance."
When she get's bitchy, SPANK THAT ASS! (#Y#)
|
|
|
02-22-2004
|
#4
|
aka Goodbye
|
Going fast is about matching parts correctly. Race cams and a dinky stock turbo don't fit this pattern. Save your money for other stuff like a bigger turbo.
__________________
2009 Corvette Z51-SOLD
1992 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX-SOLD
2013 BMW Z4-Current summer hooptie
2017 GMC Yukon-Current winter hooptie
|
|
|
02-24-2004
|
#5
|
back in the saddle again
|
http://www.stealth316.com/images/td05h-14b-cfm.gif
Looks to me it would have fun with some help 'up top'
go for it, if it spins apart, well you need more turbo .
__________________
My street car runs low 11's and my race car's personal best is a mid 11....
|
|
|
02-24-2004
|
#6
|
formerly ecoli
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On the dyno
Posts: 4,892
|
I wouldn't put much weight into the data found on that Stealth316 site.
|
|
|
02-24-2004
|
#7
|
Business as usual
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Drives: Dodge Viper and Honda Insight
Posts: 2,206
|
I had 264's on my 16g setup. I didn't notice much of a difference. Maybe on the new turbo it will help more...
__________________
97 Viper GTS
03 Mercedes CLK500 rollin on dubs...
|
|
|
02-26-2004
|
#8
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 24
|
Here are some numbers from when AMS tested several cams on 1g with a 16g and all the supporting mods:
Cams Tested:
Stock Mitsubishi
Web Cams - Street Grind
HKS 264 intake 264 Exhaust
HKS 264 intake 272 Exhaust
HKS 272 intake 272 Exhaust
Crower - Stage 3 Grind
Jun Stage 3 Grind
Peak Horsepower and Torque Results:
Stock Mitsubishi Camshafts:
Peak HP: 309.5
Peak TRQ: 295.3
Spool up on street: quick, full boost by 3.2K RPM in 3rd gear with good power when off boost and as it's coming onto boost.
Web Cams - Street Grind:
Peak HP: 314.3
Peak TRQ: 295.3
Spool up on street: slower than stock, full boost by 3.4K RPM in 3rd gear with less power off boost than stock cams.
Crower - Stage 3 Grind
Peak HP: 322.6
Peak TRQ: 314.0
Spool up on street: much slower than stock (the worst of all the cams) with full boost hitting by 3.6-3.7K RPM and a definite loss in power off boost compared to stock cams.
Jun Stage 3 Grind
Peak HP: 323.7
Peak TRQ: 323.2
Spool up on street: Car was not driven on the street.
HKS 264 Intake 264 Exhaust
Peak HP: 323.1
Peak TRQ: 333.0
Spool up on street: As good as stock (3.2K RPM), with off boost power the same if not better than stock.
HKS 264 Intake 272 Exhaust
Peak HP: 324.2
Peak TRQ: 333.1
Spool up on street: Slightly slower than stock (3.3K RPM in 3rd gear) and a very slight loss in power in off boost conditions.
HKS 272 Intake 272 Exhaust
Peak HP: 325.2
Peak TRQ: 323.4
Spool up on street: Slower than stock, full boost by 3.4K RPM in 3rd gear with a slight loss in power in off boost conditions.
It seems that the HKS dominate with the smaller turbo, I would say with even a smaller turbo like the 14b, the hks 264/264 or 264/272 would be your best bet. This would give you a close to regular idle while still keeping a lower end powerband pretty similar, and increasing the top end power significantly. If you plan on going with a large turbo (20g and up) in the future I would suggest getting the hks 272/272 because they seem to prevail when flowing huge numbers. Not quite sure how that would work with the 14b though (rough idle). I would first suggest getting all the supporting mods so you can get the most out of your cams.
|
|
|
02-26-2004
|
#9
|
Sten Sniper
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Hope
Drives: Evo VIII RS
Posts: 1,385
|
They work awesome with a 14B as well, and I love the idle.
272's all the way when it comes time for cams.
|
|
|
02-26-2004
|
#10
|
Business as usual
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Drives: Dodge Viper and Honda Insight
Posts: 2,206
|
272's on a 14b is the way to go):
__________________
97 Viper GTS
03 Mercedes CLK500 rollin on dubs...
|
|
|
02-27-2004
|
#11
|
15min late to the world
|
How much are the cams? I would not risk 272s and a stock turbo, and $600 for 30hp is a little out of wack(if the 14b would even pick that much up). I would imagine the 414s are similar to the 264s, so I dont think you would get more than 18-20hp. You already have 93cams, stay with those and when you buy a really turbo get the good cams.
~John
__________________
Moon taxi: 9.45@156.9 mph 41psi 2011... Letting people down sense 2012.
|
|
|
02-27-2004
|
#12
|
Admin
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sportsman's Paradise, LA.
Posts: 5,382
|
You should get more than 30hp with the HKS cams with supporting mods.
__________________
"You don't have a clue. You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance."
When she get's bitchy, SPANK THAT ASS! (#Y#)
|
|
|
02-28-2004
|
#13
|
15min late to the world
|
A 14b is not a supporting mod, which is the turbo being used in this set up. And I do not think running less boost would help much. Also you could see if your 14b is a lefthand thread or not.
~John
__________________
Moon taxi: 9.45@156.9 mph 41psi 2011... Letting people down sense 2012.
|
|
|
02-28-2004
|
#14
|
formerly ecoli
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On the dyno
Posts: 4,892
|
Did anyone even read what crazyboost posted above? Don't expect a huge HP gain from cams. There will be a good gain in the 7000-7500 range(I dunno about with a 14B that doesn't flow crap at that level), but not a lot of a peak HP gain. the 10-15HP gain that AMS got in their testing are right inline with the gains that I have got on cars that we put cams in, even ones with bigger turbos. Even HKS 272/272s are no where near a wild cam when compared to the cams you see on domestics and VTEC cars. To run an aggressive cam in our heads you need to cut down the valve guides to actually get some high lift. Cams are a decent mod, but they can be put off for quite a while. I would like to see what the power curve is like on a car with a sheetmetal intake and stock cams. With aftermarket cams the power still starts falling in the 6500RPM area, it usually take a sheetmetal intake to hold the power out longer or have it keep rising.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|