MitsuStyle MitsuStyle

Go Back   MitsuStyle > Tech > Tuning/Electrical

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-02-2004   #1
JasonR
Guest
 
Tournaments Won: 6

Posts: n/a
Gm mas vs. 2g mas

I have 2g mas with 2 out 4 honeycomb sections removed. I know the gm mas flows better. Will the 2g mas be fine up to 500whp. I was under the impression it will not work and need gm mas. I use dsmlink too. I am trying to make my decision based on the best set up and easier to tune with? Any response is appreciated.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004   #2
unreal808
Mr. Me Too
 
unreal808's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Albertville, MN
Drives: Suzuki GSXR
Posts: 999
I like the GM maf idea.
__________________
Take her to the limit!
unreal808 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004   #3
Alpine TSi
Banana Hammock!
 
Alpine TSi's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hastings
Drives: Shitbox
Posts: 713
I like mine, it is a much more free flowing MAS. Plus the ability to put it in blow through config is good for over flow and reduces turbulence before the turbo, also as every ricer can appreciate you can vent your BOV with no ill effect.
__________________
1992 Eagle Talon TSi AWD
320awhp/320lb-ft tq
12.772 @ 108.57

1992 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
678/1000
Alpine TSi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004   #4
A//// Guy
 
A//// Guy's Avatar
 
Bloody Seal Bounce Champion!
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: South Burbs
Drives: Slowly
Posts: 9,870
Yea and if you blow an intercooler pipe you dont have to worry about your car stalling and dying and then not having steering haha. (happened to me)
A//// Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004   #5
Nash
 
Nash's Avatar
I made 426 with a 2G MAS with my old 20G.
__________________
The problem with doing nothing is not knowing when you're finished.
Nash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004   #6
Shane@DBPerformance
formerly ecoli
 
Shane@DBPerformance's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On the dyno
Posts: 4,892
Send a message via AIM to Shane@DBPerformance
With some modifications you can probably make 500whp or more with the 2G MAS, whether is be more hacking of the unit itself, adding a bypass filter, or ignoring its output past some point. DSMLink has functions built right into it to get around MAF overrun. Blaha ran 10.5 on a 1G MAS, throw one of those on there.

I prefer no MAF/MAS at all.
__________________
www.dbptuning.com
Shane@DBPerformance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004   #7
unreal808
Mr. Me Too
 
unreal808's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Albertville, MN
Drives: Suzuki GSXR
Posts: 999
I’m going GM maf because, I need to have more room for IC piping and like the flexibility of the GM maf. and I still like GM.
__________________
Take her to the limit!
unreal808 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004   #8
Sean485
Guest
 
Tournaments Won: 6

Posts: n/a
I have a gm maft in blow through and I love it. The 2g mas is sufficent for alot of power but it is still a restriction and it is very bulky and karmen vortex maf's are a poor design IMO. If you have the money i'd go for a gm maft.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004   #9
Kracka
R U DTF bro?
 
Kracka's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
I liked my 3" MAF in blow-through....quick spool and quick throttle response.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26 View Post
I agree with Kracka.
Kracka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004   #10
JasonR
Guest
 
Tournaments Won: 6

Posts: n/a
Thanks for responses. Looks like I wont be cutting any corners. Gm mas with translator is the way to go. I just cant find ways to cut corners with the bigger turbo. I got to replace tranny/fmic/exhaust manifold/external wastegate/i/c piping/intake manifold/bigger injectors/etc. Oh well.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004   #11
SpicyOrange
 

Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 76
Hey guys I'm gonna pop in here with another stupid question. What Gm MAF sensor are you using?, and are there any articles on the install?
SpicyOrange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2004   #12
LightningGSX
Hellbound
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: St Paul
Posts: 1,390
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean485
I have a gm maft in blow through and I love it. The 2g mas is sufficent for alot of power but it is still a restriction and it is very bulky and karmen vortex maf's are a poor design IMO. If you have the money i'd go for a gm maft.
Why do you think Von Karman sensors are a bad design?
__________________
-Nulli Secundus-
LightningGSX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2004   #13
Sean485
Guest
 
Tournaments Won: 6

Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by LightningGSX
Why do you think Von Karman sensors are a bad design?
Thier really restrictive, and if you get too low of airflow through them (hacking the mas too much) the air going through the metered section doesn't have enough speed to make the vorticies consistantly and it gets an incorrect reading and if you get too much airflow through them it also has issues creating and counting the vorticies consistantly (mas overrun)

A hotwire mas or vpc (map sensor) system is much less restrictive and consistant IMO.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2004   #14
1ViciousGSX
Admin
 
1ViciousGSX's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sportsman's Paradise, LA.
Posts: 5,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpicyOrange
Hey guys I'm gonna pop in here with another stupid question. What Gm MAF sensor are you using?, and are there any articles on the install?
3.5 inch LS1 maf.
__________________

"You don't have a clue. You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance."

When she get's bitchy, SPANK THAT ASS!
(#Y#)
1ViciousGSX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2004   #15
Kracka
R U DTF bro?
 
Kracka's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
I was using the 3".
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26 View Post
I agree with Kracka.
Kracka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2004   #16
Sean485
Guest
 
Tournaments Won: 6

Posts: n/a
I am also using a 3" sensor. If you are running draw through a 3.5" sensor wouldn't hurt if you have a big turbo but 3" sensor would be more suitable for blow through with your average 2.5" ic piping. Running a 3.5" sensor with 2.5" piping is too much of a transition too quickly IMO and wouldn't help very much.

As for the install are you running blow through or draw through? If your doing draw through you just stuff a 3" filter on the inlet of the maf and the maf should fit right into your intake tube just like the stock mas. If your doing blow through you just need to physically find room for it in your ic pipe (which will obviously vary depending on your current mods and remeber to figure in the length of the couplers) and then cut the pipe and use 2 renforced silicon reducers with t-bolt clamps.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2004   #17
1ViciousGSX
Admin
 
1ViciousGSX's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sportsman's Paradise, LA.
Posts: 5,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ViciousGSX
3.5 inch LS1 maf.
In draw through configuration.
__________________

"You don't have a clue. You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance."

When she get's bitchy, SPANK THAT ASS!
(#Y#)
1ViciousGSX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.