Destroker kit, want to know all! - Page 2

**Halon** · 09-22-2009

Ha.

I also agree with taking shifting into consideration. Having a high revving motor might seem cool, but being able to shift at that high of an RPM will be something you'll have to take into consideration. That's one thing that attracts me to strokers. Oh well if I can't rev as high, I make up for it in bottom end torque, and don't have to worry about high RPM shifting.

turbotalon1g · 09-22-2009

^my thoughts exactly if you setup isn't gonna make power to 9k+ why hold a motor to do it? ESP for a street car.
Have u heard about using stroker pistons in reg 2.0 to get better rod ratio because of the relocated pin height?

**Goat Blower** · 09-22-2009

You'd have to use correspondingly longer rods as well.

**scheides** · 09-22-2009

So, any weirdness with install that anyone would know since its a 4G64 block? Didn't the 2.4 guys have to re-mark their cam gears and use a different tbelt or something?

**v8klla** · 09-22-2009

Timing belt and cam gears from 1995 DOHC Galant I believe, might be 1994, but again this applies to the 6 bolt stuff only. However, you can use the 4g63 belt and cam gears if you degree them

**Goat Blower** · 09-22-2009

I just happen to know a certain someone with a set of those DOHC cam gears laying around.

mukapahnpy · 09-23-2009

Where can one find these off the shelf custom rods?

**v8klla** · 09-23-2009

As of right now you can't find 6 bolt anywhere as they are no longer mass produced by anyone that I am aware of. 7 Bolt rods are still being made in the 156mm length by Manley, and you can find them from this guy

**scheides** · 09-23-2009

So what t-belt do you need to use for the evo application? And what cam gears, those same 2.4 ones?

C3L1CA · 09-23-2009

Magnus has the parts and can build you one of these motors as well. It was something I was looking into for a little bit, but a cheap set of eagles and off the shelf pistions seemed like a lot cheaper and easier option. They do sound and seem pretty bad ass though.

mukapahnpy · 09-24-2009

The Magnus route is a tad bit expensive.

1QUICK4 · 09-25-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by mukapahnpy

The Magnus route is a tad bit expensive.

2.14 in general is expensive.

It would be sweet in a light wieght, high revving, auto'd FWD though

**v8klla** · 09-25-2009

That's what bothers me as it really shouldn't be, there is no additional machining and the only "custom" piece is the connecting rods. Like I said we will have 156mm length rods in the near future and they will be very cost effective

mukapahnpy · 09-25-2009

^ Let us know when.

It would then come down to a 63 7-bolt or 64 6-bolt 2.2l build, for myself anyways.

blageo23 · 09-25-2009

I was also considering this when I built my 2.4. At the time I did not have a tranny that could shift that high so I scrapped that idea. Still would like to do one some day.

Cost would be about the same as a built 2.0. The only additional cost for most people would be a 2.4 block. Just find a friend that wants to do a 2.3l and then buy a 2.0 motor and a 2.4. swap cranks and you have a 2.1 and a 2.3

mukapahnpy · 09-25-2009

2235cc is what I'd be shooting for... 94mm eagle crank with either 156rods / -3 pistons or 159rods / -6 pistons in a 64. This will be my fall (winter) build.