05-15-2007
|
#1
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Brooklyn Park
Posts: 513
|
.020 over pistons..
Ok so i just figured out that my car has .020 oversized pistons on the rebuild.. suppositly it was rebuilt by parts from "top line" anyone ever heard of this brand??
btw what is the major difference between stock and .020
|
|
|
05-15-2007
|
#2
|
formerly ecoli
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On the dyno
Posts: 4,892
|
Re: .020 over pistons..
Top Line is some cheap brand that makes a lot of OEM replacement parts. I wouldn't trust their stock replacement pistons as much as Mitsu ones.
The difference between stock(STD) and .020 is .020 inches
|
|
|
05-15-2007
|
#3
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Brooklyn Park
Posts: 513
|
Re: .020 over pistons..
performance wise?
|
|
|
05-15-2007
|
#4
|
Is funding Exxon.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ham Lake
Drives: like a bat outta hell!
Posts: 7,983
|
Re: .020 over pistons..
Basically nothing performance wise.
__________________
Is burning corn and stayin' warm!
My motorcycle is stock and reliable, my Talon is neither!
|
|
|
05-15-2007
|
#5
|
formerly ecoli
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On the dyno
Posts: 4,892
|
Re: .020 over pistons..
More displacement, and thinner cylinder walls.
|
|
|
05-15-2007
|
#6
|
15min late to the world
|
Re: .020 over pistons..
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecoli
More displacement, and thinner cylinder walls.
|
By about .020" per hole I would assume.
~John
__________________
Moon taxi: 9.45@156.9 mph 41psi 2011... Letting people down sense 2012.
|
|
|
05-15-2007
|
#7
|
formerly ecoli
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On the dyno
Posts: 4,892
|
Re: .020 over pistons..
Pie * R^2?
|
|
|
05-16-2007
|
#8
|
Shit Rocket Pilot
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Shoreview, MN
Drives: 2003 Evolution VIII
Posts: 7,752
|
Re: .020 over pistons..
I like pie, but I believe you're looking for Pi.
__________________
"If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough." -Mario Andretti
03 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tachyon
Every minute you spend in your Evo, not in boost, is a minute of your life you'll never get back.
|
|
|
|
05-16-2007
|
#9
|
formerly ecoli
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On the dyno
Posts: 4,892
|
Re: .020 over pistons..
Nope, French Silk * R^2.
|
|
|
05-16-2007
|
#10
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Brooklyn Park
Posts: 513
|
Re: .020 over pistons..
soooooo if i have a 2.0 whats the displacement then
|
|
|
05-16-2007
|
#11
|
formerly ecoli
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On the dyno
Posts: 4,892
|
Re: .020 over pistons..
You gained around 23cc. So you went from slightly smaller than a 2.0l to slightly bigger.
|
|
|
05-16-2007
|
#12
|
R U DTF bro?
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
|
Re: .020 over pistons..
You now have a 2.02L engine, Hondas beware!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26
I agree with Kracka.
|
|
|
|
05-16-2007
|
#13
|
Shit Rocket Pilot
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Shoreview, MN
Drives: 2003 Evolution VIII
Posts: 7,752
|
Re: .020 over pistons..
Isn't the displacement of the 4G63 something like 1996cc? I'd do the math if I had the specific bore and stroke measurements.
__________________
"If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough." -Mario Andretti
03 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tachyon
Every minute you spend in your Evo, not in boost, is a minute of your life you'll never get back.
|
|
|
|
05-16-2007
|
#14
|
R U DTF bro?
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
|
Re: .020 over pistons..
I seem to remember it being 1998cc, but I will double-check that.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26
I agree with Kracka.
|
|
|
|
05-16-2007
|
#15
|
back in the saddle again
|
Re: .020 over pistons..
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecoli
Nope, French Silk * R^2.
|
I perfer:
{(Whip Cream)/(Pumpkin Pie)} * R^2
__________________
My street car runs low 11's and my race car's personal best is a mid 11....
|
|
|
05-16-2007
|
#16
|
R U DTF bro?
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
|
Re: .020 over pistons..
Taken from SCC:
he 4G63 name simply indicates that this Sirius engine displaces two liters. While 4G63s have all used 85mm cylinder bores and an 88mm stroke (1997cc total displacement), the 4G63 installed in the Mighty Max pickup had 84mm bores and a 90mm stroke, resulting in 1996 cc of displacement (but the same nominal 2.0-liter description)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26
I agree with Kracka.
|
|
|
|
05-16-2007
|
#17
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Brooklyn Park
Posts: 513
|
Re: .020 over pistons..
owned.
these .020 more inches will smack on viper/vettes, i've noticed
|
|
|
05-16-2007
|
#18
|
aka Goodbye
|
Re: .020 over pistons..
About as much performance increase as going from 87 to 89 octane with no tuning changes.
__________________
2009 Corvette Z51-SOLD
1992 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX-SOLD
2013 BMW Z4-Current summer hooptie
2017 GMC Yukon-Current winter hooptie
|
|
|
05-16-2007
|
#19
|
R U DTF bro?
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
|
Re: .020 over pistons..
Quote:
Originally Posted by driftn1g
owned.
these .020 more inches will smack on viper/vettes, i've noticed
|
I seriously hope you kidding, unfortunately I doubt you are.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26
I agree with Kracka.
|
|
|
|
05-16-2007
|
#20
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Brooklyn Park
Posts: 513
|
Re: .020 over pistons..
I'm
one day.... it will happen,
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|