Quote:
Originally Posted by FattyBoomBatty
God you're retarded. In the article it's obvious that the judge heard the accused speeder try and weasle his way out of a ticket by questioning the ability of a cop to notice a car going faster than it should. He then stuck it right back in the speeder's face by saying 'cops now have the right to ticket you based on their judgement.'
It's not a ploy to get the government some more money (which by the way would be how much? 100 bucks a month - yeah that'll fill the coffers back up in NO time!), it's done to get whiney bitches like the dude caught speeding from wasting the court's time.
|
Wow. You really need to open your eyes. Do you really think a state's supreme court would pass a judgment like this just to rub it in some guy's face? They made this ruling to give the government more power over the taxpayers; simple as that.
Look at the big picture. How exactly do you figure this will only raise $100/month? This is basically a free pass for cops to hand out speeding tickets to whom ever they feel like. Remember that Toyota Celica with Action Package commercial? Our government is broke and tickets are one of the quickest/easiest ways to raise additional revenue.
Threaded Mode